Hmmm, I guess what you're saying does kind of make more sense, but I'm gonna try and have a little [misplaced] hope in the decency of humanity.
Saturday, June 12, 2010
Have you read the book Pretties and Uglies? I think thats what theyre called. Everyones born ugly and then when they turn 16 they go through some sort of caterpillar/butterfly-like-transformation and then theyre pretty for the rest of their life.
Um, no. Sounds like an interesting idea, but one of those ideas that is very easily corrupted into something grossly mushy and sweet.
Friday, June 11, 2010
LOL. Wars as in all the 'beautiful' people may decide they're the only true people that deserve to live - and dream up a form of genocide to get rid of all the non-designer people.
Oh yeah. I suppose that could happen. I'd say its more likely that they'd all just selfsegregate and try to pretend all the ugly people don't exist. Or maybe we're both being too negative; maybe they'd try to like, make sure all the ugly people get to enjoy their beauty or something.
Most people will learn to love themselves though. Even you probably love at least most of yourself. Designing children is only going to lead to superficiality and possibly wars, even. Who's Christina Hendricks?
Yeah, I suppose you are right on the first two points. But I definately disagree that designer children will lead to superficiality and wars. Yes, superficial people will have designer children, but they would have done something along those lines with them after they were born anyway. Most people will realise just how screwed up it is to design your child in your image and stay sane. And I've honestly no idea how it could lead to war. Heated debates and rallys like the abortion issue sure, but wars??
Christina is an amazingly beautiful american actress. Just look her up in google images. [Don't worry, I just checked and with no safeSearch there wasn't any nudity..]
I often think you say things just to be different, to wind people up and look like you have some radically different point of view. Which doesn't help you, because often it's either rude, nasty or utter bullshit. What's with the shallow take on beauty?
The shallow take on beauty is partly how shallow I think beauty is and partly how shallow I really am. One of those double belief things I'm trying to rid myself of.
I definately don't say things just to be different, I honestly believe what I say when I'm saying it. But it's definately happened before with me saying one thing and someone [actually, I think you on one or two occasions] showing me how I'm wrong. So sometimes what I say does turn out to be bullshit. That rude and nasty side of things is just angry me leaking through as he often does.
Wednesday, June 9, 2010
Pedantic-Pants
Example: "Me and Alex went-" "You mean Alex and I" "NO ONE GIVES A FUCK"
Well apparently, and this is news to me, people don't like that. For some reason, people don't like it when they are constantly corrected. So much so that one unnamed [but labelled] person asked me to write a blog on it. [Which it is okay to do. Seriously, I've asked you to make requests, WHY DO YOU IGNORE ME SO??] Anyway, basically the deal is that normal people don't like pedantic people. But I'd like to clear up just exactly what pedantic is.
When someone says that they had previously "walk to the store and back", and they are corrected with "You mean you walked to the store and back", the replier is not being pedantic. The first speaker was in fact retarded. When one person says that extreme right and left wing governments all end up the same way and someone else replies that they often have different business regulations, the second person can go fuck themself. In the first example, the second speaker is being pedantic BECAUSE THAT RULE IS STUPID, POINTLESS, ARBITRARY AND RETARDED AND ANYONE WHO SAYS OTHERWISE I WILL ATTACK IN THEIR SLEEP.
Do you not agree that if we all have different perceptions on beauty, changing our children is not in fact making them more beautiful? There is no point? We all learn to love ourselves. We don't want to love someone else (an altered us).
I'm pretty much willing to accept your first point [mostly because its right]. The rest of it though is complete bullcrap. Plenty of people do not love themselves. I am often among them. Especially on the point of beauty. And again in both a beauty and non-beauty capacity I love plenty of peope. [But guess which category Christina Hendricks falls under.]
Tuesday, June 8, 2010
eleven11
From what I've gathered [and to be fair I tend to tune out when people I know I'll lose the argument with are being retarded] you're supposed to make a wish at 11:11. No one actually told me that they come true. Just like the thing with birthday cakes. [Which I definately never believed. /Shifty eyes.] I think it's of some crappy art house movie.
Now I'm going to over look the wish part. I can't even start that. However I will point out how unimpressive the time of 11:11 is. I mean, it's just the same number, four times, with some dots in the middle. Woo-fuckin-hoo. If this thing had been put at like 12:34, it would be a bit more interesting. Personally I would be happy to accept that any child conceived and/or born at 12:34:56 [hours:mins:seconds] will have magical powers. Or perhaps something like 12:48, so the number doubles each time.
Come on people, if you're gonna have a retarded belief, at least make it interesting like scientology did. Put some effort in.
Monday, June 7, 2010
Gene Therapy: The Right Thing To Do
The benefits of using this to effectively destroy hereditary diseases is undoutable. But there is a good deal of unhappiness over the fact that parents will also be able to change what the kid will look like when they grow up too. Supposedly this will make people more and more generic to conform to some sort of standard definition of beauty as parents try to make their kids more attractive.
Firstly, what the hell is wrong with helping kids be more attractive?? The world would be such a happier place if everyone was beautiful. Think about it. No ugly people. Unless I'm mistaken [which I'm not] that's a deciding factor in most peoples conceptions of heaven [definately in mine]. And that whole scenario won't come to pass anyway. Every single human being has their own opinion on what beautiful is. Many of them are very similar, many of them clash horribly.
And even if every last baby in the human race [including all of the babies from third world countries, YOU RETARDS] gets some sort of gene therapy to look towards ONE SINGLE idea of beauty, it doesn't matter, because beauty is an entirely relative concept. If everyone in the world was on what is now the beautiful end of the appearance spectrum, then those who were still closer to ou definition of ugly would become the ugly people of that world, there would just be less differentiation.
So fuck off and let us make the world a more beautiful place.
Friday, June 4, 2010
Would you rather get up early or sleep late?
Well, I'd like to say sleeping in late, but getting up nice and early at 10am is a great feeling.
El Doggo
I shall have either a Scottish Terrier or a Caucasian Shepard. Scottish Terriers are those little furry dogs from the Chum commercials. And they're from Scotland, in case you didn't figure that out [which you probably didn't]. They're very cute. I want one.
Most people don't seem to know about Caucasian Shepards. I'm not a great explainer of things in case you haven't figured that out [which you probably haven't], but here goes. They are very fluffy and sweet looking. When they are puppies, they are the size of a human torso. Adults are about the size of a fully grown man. And not one of those sissy, adrogynous [and freakishly arousing] half-men like Alex Briggs. A real man. And they have massive teeth. Make for great attack dogs. I would name him Theodore.
Or perhaps both. You know all of those little kid cartoon shows or movies with the little dog in charge of the big dog. That'd be adorable.
DO NOT LAUGH AT ME!!!!!!
And never get me a puppy as a present. Because then I would be unhappy with it [because if I didnt pick it, it sucks] and would name it Hamlet. And it would get confused between itself and food. And then eat itself all up. Canine-abalism style.
Never Pay The Reaper With / Love Only
I can't quite explain the feeling, but it really does haunt me. Maybe you can relate with something from another song, I dunno. Sometimes it's like I need to figure out what it means. Does death not accept love as payment?? Does he have a sign on him saying NO LOVE like shops that don't have eftpos [because they're retarded and SHOULD HAVE FUCKING EFTPOS]?? Is it that he values it, but just not enough to mean anything by itself, like hes asexual or something?? [Which I suppose would make sense, seeing as he's a skeleton.]
Or maybe it's not even really meant to refer to the reaper at all. Maybe it's trying to say that we need to actually accomplish something with our lives other than just being mushy and stupid and obsessing over some person[s]. Which makes sense when I think about it, but then I mellow out and forget about it, then after a while the line comes back to haunt me and the whole process starts all over again.
Stupud brain. MAY CTHULU DEVOUR YOU!!!!